Daily Debrief · Weekend edition

Pairing AI-enabled battery storage systems with onshore and offshore wind turbines could help cut down on wasted green power and improve profits, says vice president at leading turbine maker

Hamburg summit will see nations commit to joint approach as security takes centre stage, it is reported

Planned Morecambe array could become an inadvertent casualty of recent offshore wind auction round if it is dragged down by cancelled neighbouring site

BusinessGreen's latest Spotlight webinar explored how green claims rules have evolved and how businesses can develop more effective green marketing campaigns In recent years, the use of terms such as 'eco', 'green', 'sustainable', and 'low emissions' in advertising and marketing campaigns have become something of a red flag for regulators and watchdogs. Rigorous new rules and guidance designed to tackle so-called 'greenwash' and ensure environmental claims are properly substantiated have triggered a crackdown on corporate communications that overstate green credentials or make use of vague terms that can be easily misunderstood. In response, some businesses have sought to be more careful in their green claims, but others have instead opted for 'green hushing', as they have stopped trying to promote their sustainability efforts. This was the backdrop for BusinessGreen's latest Spotlight webinar, titled How to minimise the risk of greenwash and maximise the impact of green messaging, which brought together leading advertising and marketing experts to explore how companies minimise the risk of 'greenwashing' without foregoing green marketing all together. Industry leaders from B2B agency The Marketing Pod, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), and trade body the Advertising Association also discussed the best practices that can help ensure accurate green messages and campaigns can cut through with their target audiences. What is greenwashing? In late 2022, 'greenwash' was among 370 new words added to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, confirming a term first used in the late 1980s had finally entered in the mainstream. The dictionary confirmed the term could be both a verb, defining it as "to make (something, such as a product, policy, or practice) appear to be more environmentally friendly or less environmentally damaging than it really is" or "to mislead (someone) by means of greenwashing", and a noun, meaning "something (such as a claim or action) that is intended to make a product, policy, activity, etc. appear to be more environmentally friendly or less environmentally damaging than it really is". "When we think about greenwashing, it's really where a company is talking about their sustainability credentials - whether that's as a company or for a product - but without having strong evidence around those claims and with the potential to mislead," explained Ellie Smith, marketing strategy consultant at The Marketing Pod. Though first coined decades ago as a niche concern, Miles Lockwood, director of complaints and investigations at the ASA, detailed how the watchdog has felt compelled to go "further and faster" in tackling the problem in recent years, having launched a targeted drive to address climate and environment-related claims in 2021. The resulting crackdown has delivered tangible results, with brands such as Nike, Superdry, and Lacoste, coffee maker Lavazza, cruise operators Seascanner and Cruise Circle, and green companies such as Aira, Good Energy, and Octopus Energy having seen adverts banned by ASA over misleading green claims in the last year alone. The rulings against companies that are widely considered to be leaders in corporate climate action underscores how the vast majority of greenwashing is accidental, rather than malicious. "I think most people may make mistakes inadvertently," said Stephen Woodford, chief executive of the Advertising Association. "There is a myth that greenwash in advertising is widespread and highly prevalent. It may be in other parts of communication, but it's not in advertising. It'd be very foolhardy strategy to set out to mislead the public in your advertising through making claims that you can't substantiate." Lockwood added that while some "rotten apples" inevitably exist, the overwhelming majority of companies found to be guilty of greenwashing simply get it wrong while trying to do the right thing. "They make a genuine mistake," he says. "And time and time again over the last few years what we see are similar issues to fix." The good news is the crackdown appears to be working. The consensus among the panellists was that companies have become more careful in the claims they make and better at backing up green promotions with detailed information to justify their claims. Consequently, many of the ASA's more recent rulings have tended to centre on quite technical interpretations of whether claims have been placed within context or adequately substantiated. Egregiously exaggerated claims or nefarious attempts to deliberately mislead have become extremely rare. Are stringent rules leading to 'greenhushing'? Recent research found more than 99 per cent of travel agent adverts monitored by the ASA contained no environmental content, prompting speculation that given the number, profile, and range of companies that have fallen foul of green claims rules, firms were becoming less willing to promote their environmental credentials. For Smith, "greenhushing" has the potential to stifle vital knowledge sharing and debate. But she argued that rather than shutting up shop entirely, most firms have responded to more stringent rules and guidelines by communicating with more caution, which should work in favour of those businesses with the most impressive environmental performance. "Clearly, regulations are not there to quieten businesses," she says. "They're there to put a level of rigour and confidence around the way in which we communicate." Lockwood said criticism from some quarters that the ASA has gone too far in its policing of green claims is "a bit frustrating", arguing companies ca avoid greenwashing without switching to greenhushing. "I think reducing everything to greenwashing on the one hand, or saying nothing on the other, disasterises the challenge at hand," he said. "We've got to make sure companies who are innovating and are making green claims which are good for consumers have space to do so. There are pathways forward. Even if you are in a high carbon sector, there are always going to be ways to share a responsible message." ESG backlash Given the loud and boisterous backlash against ESG claims over the past year, and delays to high profile regulations such as to the EU's Green Claims Code and broader due diligence and sustainability reporting requirements, it would be understandable if some businesses sought to throttle back on their environmental claims. Yet Smith stressed that while there has been a shift in tone from some companies' communication efforts, it often reflects maturing markets and audience expectations, rather than a loss of faith or a retreat from sustainability goals. "It's less about being seen to do good, and it's more about understanding how sustained sustainable practices support improved commerciality," she argued. "That's the change in message - [framing it] in terms of business resilience, in terms of having a long-term sustainable business, in terms of the financial benefits of reducing wastage, etc, all of which are sustainability focused initiatives. There was probably a time where it's seen as a 'do-gooder' message. I think that still stands, but I think it's moving towards recognition that operating more sustainably brings with it better commercial outcomes." What can businesses do? What steps, then, can businesses take to minimise the risk of greenwash and maximise the positive impact of their green messaging? The panel provided a useful overview of the best practices companies and their marketing departments should embrace. Be less absolute: For Lockwood, most businesses which fall foul of the ASA are "a little bit too absolute" in their green claims. Companies should avoid "being too bombastic [and] making claims which require such a high level of evidence that it's very hard to back them up", he advised. The solution, he said, is to instead be "more conditional". For example, he explained how terms such as 'eco-friendly', 'sustainable', and 'green' attract very high levels of evidential requirement, because they are absolute. "They are suggesting that something continue indefinitely without harm to the environment," he explained. Substantiate everything: Describing the ASA as a "fearsome regulator", Woodford, stressed that ultimately all advertising - including copy on company websites - must be "legal, decent, honest and truthful". For Smith, that means substantiating everything is a crucial step towards achieving such high standards. "It's almost no different from any other corporate communication - you've got to have defensible, accurate messaging that can be backed up, whether that's for a technical product feature or for sustainability credentials," she said. Embrace nuance and admit failings: Smith added that regularly and honestly sharing progress towards sustainable goals - admitting when things have gone wrong or milestones have been missed - can provide valuable lessons for others. "Businesses and individuals working in the space are becoming more comfortable with nuance and admitting failings, or when they have set a target, they're not making as much progress as they intended, and being more open and taking people on the journey," she said. Find points of reference: Though companies are being bombarded with more ESG reporting requirements and data points than ever, Smith argued these can serve as crucial points of reference for brand messaging. Though she stressed storytelling is ultimately where engagement happens, opportunities to include third-party validation are "really helpful". As such, Smith advised firms to "put a number against" green claims. "If we can say we've reduced, for instance, Scope Two by X per cent, we can be really specific, or talk about an exact percentage that's come from renewable energy, that enables the consumer to understand what it is that they're purchasing and make a confident decision," she said. Keep it simple: Lockwood warned green claims can be among the hardest to understand, meaning its vital communicators put themselves in the shoes of a consumer who has not spent days, weeks, or months agonising over product details and specifications. "Put your claims into layperson's terms," he said. "I think that really helps you along the pathway to compliance." Link comms and sustainability teams: For Smith, the companies which are best at communicating their green credentials are those where sustainability is central to the business ethos. "It makes the comms teams feel much more comfortable in terms of what they can say, and what they can't say," she explained. "I think having a really strong link between comms teams and sustainability teams is crucial, because the sustainability teams will spot pretty quickly if there's something that doesn't ring true or that they don't feel comfortable with." Woodford flagged how a core component of his industry body's Ad Net Zero initiative is to bring sustainability and marketing teams closer together to ensure every decision has a sustainability consideration - and thereby "normalising" them. "Whether you're making a media choice, a platform choice or a production choice, you're automatically thinking about sustainability," he said. Green claims can deliver Greenhushing can be tempting, but it is almost always an overreaction to greenwash risks that can be avoided with a bit of forethought and clarity. And meanwhile, polling continues to show that consumers are interested in green products and supportive of climate action. Products that boast credible sustainability credentials can often outcompete comparable products without green credentials, which is why many of the world's biggest businesses are continuing to invest in sustainability. It therefore makes sense for those same companies to continue to promote their environmental efforts, even if they have to be careful about the words they use when doing so. BusinessGreen's webinar - Spotlight on Marketing: How to minimise the risk of greenwash and maximise the impact of green messaging - was hosted in association with The Marketing Pod, and can be watched back in full here.

Partner Insight: Jason Dean, chief technology officer at Equans Digital, explores the opportunities and considerations for implementing digital building systems to accelerate sustainability goals. Technology is now embedded into almost every aspect of how buildings are operated and maintained. This shift is being driven by two factors: the need to run estates more efficiently and sustainably, and the rapid growth in the data being produced by modern building systems. As a result, digital capability is moving from being a differentiator to a fundamental requirement. Building asset owners and Facilities Management (FM) providers are now managing unprecedented volumes of information. An array of embedded digital systems all generate their own datasets - these include Building Management Systems, SCADA, BIM models, IoT sensors, specialist control systems and CAFM platforms. Historically, these systems were designed to operate independently, and the data they produced remained locked in functional silos. That model no longer works. Organisations increasingly require integrated insights on their buildings' performance, not isolated reports. At the same time, AI and machine learning tools require consistent, structured and accessible data to deliver meaningful outputs. The problem facing the built environment today isn't a lack of data - it's the opposite. There is too much, coming from too many places, in too many formats. To realise the full value of AI, digital twins and predictive maintenance, FM operators must first solve the data problem. This requires moving towards a centralised data ontology that enables semantic interoperability across all systems. In practice, this means establishing a single way of defining, tagging and interpreting data, regardless of its source. This is not a quick or easy task. Collecting, cleaning, staging and securing large, complex datasets is technically challenging and resource-intensive. And building a scalable, cyber-secure environment to host these datasets requires careful planning and investment. But the benefits are significant. Once data is unified and reliable, it becomes the foundation for new capabilities, including: Predictive and condition-based maintenance High-accuracy digital twins for operational modelling Automated environmental reporting Real-time energy and carbon optimisation Portfolio-wide performance insights These capabilities don't simply improve visibility - they directly influence cost, carbon, compliance and customer experience. Our clients, particularly in regulated sectors such as utilities, are under mounting pressure to evidence their progress on sustainability and wider ESG goals. This has led to an increased demand for: Automated energy reporting Auditable measurement and verification (M&V) Real-time environmental performance data Clear and consistent carbon calculations Demonstrable compliance with evolving regulations Delivering this level of reporting accurately and reliably is only possible with a strong data architecture behind it. As sustainability expectations continue to rise, the ability to produce high-quality data at speed will become a core service requirement across the Facilities Management industry. The role of data science in FM is expanding rapidly. Tasks that once relied on manual inputs are now increasingly automated and analytical. As AI and machine learning tools mature, they will further reshape the industry. Building asset owners who harness this change towards data engineering, cybersecurity, cloud architecture and AI-ready ontologies will be in a significantly stronger position in the years to come. Those who delay, will find themselves constrained by legacy systems. The volume of available data will only continue to grow. The challenge -and opportunity - lies in turning that data into insight, efficiency and measurable value. The work involved in building the right digital foundations is substantial, but the long-term advantages are clear. With the right architecture, the right security and the right tools, organisations have the potential not only to improve how their buildings are run day to day, but to unlock insights to support strategic ambitions for years to come. Jason Dean is chief technology officer at Equans Digital. To find out more about Equans Digital in the UK & Ireland, click here. This article is sponsored by Equans UK & Ireland.

New framework will reject raw price competition in favour of a new focus on “sustainability, capability and viability”

Thomas Brostrøm previously led Orsted’s North America offshore wind unit before spells at oil giant Shell and ACWA Power

New EVA England survey and consultation response warn millions of households risk missing out on affordable home charging without urgent planning reform

Davos, Switzerland — CATL has been honored with the World Economic Forum’s 2026 MINDS (Meaningful, Intelligent, Novel, Deployable Solutions) Award, recognizing its groundbreaking project “Augmented Intelligence Leading Next-Generation Lithium-ion Battery Design,” which has been acclaimed as a global benchmark for AI-driven industrial application. This project revolutionizes the lithium-ion battery R&D ...

The Morecambe project, planned 30 km off the Lancashire coast in northwest England, is expected to consist of up to 35 wind turbines and a capacity of 480MW.

DNV signs its second agreement with a Norwegian start-up in bioenergy with carbon capture and storage.

Nuclear Transport Solutions sign new strategic agreement on development of transport package designed to safely move the next generation of nuclear fuel.

The programme supports the development and demonstration of heat pump technologies and tools, and solutions for optimised deployment of heat pumps.

Electric van sales are behind government targets, but those fleets that have switched are seeing a real difference Swinging a fully laden electric van around a training centre in Bishop’s Stortford feels easy, with instant acceleration that belies the racks of heavy equipment in the back. Perhaps too easy, as the sudden shriek of its proximity sensor suggests the Guardian was a whisker away from a bill for some new paintwork. The van in question belongs to Openreach, BT’s fibre broadband subsidiary. It is one of 6,000 electric vans out of 23,400 in Britain’s second-largest commercial fleet – and a further 1,000 are expected to be added by March. Continue reading...